Merge pull request #918 from nextcloud/stable10_891
[Stable10] [OC] Fix unmerged shares repair targetdecision
This commit is contained in:
blizzz
GitHub
commit
379260732c
|
|
@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedShares implements IRepairStep {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
$query = $this->connection->getQueryBuilder();
|
||||
$query
|
||||
->select('item_source', 'id', 'file_target', 'permissions', 'parent', 'share_type')
|
||||
->select('item_source', 'id', 'file_target', 'permissions', 'parent', 'share_type', 'stime')
|
||||
->from('share')
|
||||
->where($query->expr()->eq('share_type', $query->createParameter('shareType')))
|
||||
->andWhere($query->expr()->in('share_with', $query->createParameter('shareWiths')))
|
||||
|
|
@ -148,6 +148,52 @@ class RepairUnmergedShares implements IRepairStep {
|
|||
return $groupedShares;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private function isPotentialDuplicateName($name) {
|
||||
return (preg_match('/\(\d+\)(\.[^\.]+)?$/', $name) === 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Decide on the best target name based on all group shares and subshares,
|
||||
* goal is to increase the likeliness that the chosen name matches what
|
||||
* the user is expecting.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For this, we discard the entries with parenthesis "(2)".
|
||||
* In case the user also renamed the duplicates to a legitimate name, this logic
|
||||
* will still pick the most recent one as it's the one the user is most likely to
|
||||
* remember renaming.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If no suitable subshare is found, use the least recent group share instead.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param array $groupShares group share entries
|
||||
* @param array $subShares sub share entries
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return string chosen target name
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private function findBestTargetName($groupShares, $subShares) {
|
||||
$pickedShare = null;
|
||||
// sort by stime, this also properly sorts the direct user share if any
|
||||
@usort($subShares, function($a, $b) {
|
||||
return ((int)$a['stime'] - (int)$b['stime']);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
foreach ($subShares as $subShare) {
|
||||
// skip entries that have parenthesis with numbers
|
||||
if ($this->isPotentialDuplicateName($subShare['file_target'])) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// pick any share found that would match, the last being the most recent
|
||||
$pickedShare = $subShare;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// no suitable subshare found
|
||||
if ($pickedShare === null) {
|
||||
// use least recent group share target instead
|
||||
$pickedShare = $groupShares[0];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return $pickedShare['file_target'];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Fix the given received share represented by the set of group shares
|
||||
* and matching sub shares
|
||||
|
|
@ -171,7 +217,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedShares implements IRepairStep {
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
$targetPath = $groupShares[0]['file_target'];
|
||||
$targetPath = $this->findBestTargetName($groupShares, $subShares);
|
||||
|
||||
// check whether the user opted out completely of all subshares
|
||||
$optedOut = true;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ use OCP\Migration\IOutput;
|
|||
use OCP\Migration\IRepairStep;
|
||||
use Test\TestCase;
|
||||
use OC\Share20\DefaultShareProvider;
|
||||
use OCP\IUserManager;
|
||||
use OCP\IGroupManager;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Tests for repairing invalid shares
|
||||
|
|
@ -44,6 +46,15 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
/** @var \OCP\IDBConnection */
|
||||
private $connection;
|
||||
|
||||
/** @var int */
|
||||
private $lastShareTime;
|
||||
|
||||
/** @var IUserManager */
|
||||
private $userManager;
|
||||
|
||||
/** @var IGroupManager */
|
||||
private $groupManager;
|
||||
|
||||
protected function setUp() {
|
||||
parent::setUp();
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -58,42 +69,14 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
$this->connection = \OC::$server->getDatabaseConnection();
|
||||
$this->deleteAllShares();
|
||||
|
||||
$user1 = $this->getMock('\OCP\IUser');
|
||||
$user1->expects($this->any())
|
||||
->method('getUID')
|
||||
->will($this->returnValue('user1'));
|
||||
$this->userManager = $this->getMock('\OCP\IUserManager');
|
||||
$this->groupManager = $this->getMock('\OCP\IGroupManager');
|
||||
|
||||
$user2 = $this->getMock('\OCP\IUser');
|
||||
$user2->expects($this->any())
|
||||
->method('getUID')
|
||||
->will($this->returnValue('user2'));
|
||||
|
||||
$users = [$user1, $user2];
|
||||
|
||||
$groupManager = $this->getMock('\OCP\IGroupManager');
|
||||
$groupManager->expects($this->any())
|
||||
->method('getUserGroupIds')
|
||||
->will($this->returnValueMap([
|
||||
// owner
|
||||
[$user1, ['samegroup1', 'samegroup2']],
|
||||
// recipient
|
||||
[$user2, ['recipientgroup1', 'recipientgroup2']],
|
||||
]));
|
||||
|
||||
$userManager = $this->getMock('\OCP\IUserManager');
|
||||
$userManager->expects($this->once())
|
||||
->method('countUsers')
|
||||
->will($this->returnValue([2]));
|
||||
$userManager->expects($this->once())
|
||||
->method('callForAllUsers')
|
||||
->will($this->returnCallback(function(\Closure $closure) use ($users) {
|
||||
foreach ($users as $user) {
|
||||
$closure($user);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}));
|
||||
// used to generate incremental stimes
|
||||
$this->lastShareTime = time();
|
||||
|
||||
/** @var \OCP\IConfig $config */
|
||||
$this->repair = new RepairUnmergedShares($config, $this->connection, $userManager, $groupManager);
|
||||
$this->repair = new RepairUnmergedShares($config, $this->connection, $this->userManager, $this->groupManager);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected function tearDown() {
|
||||
|
|
@ -108,6 +91,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private function createShare($type, $sourceId, $recipient, $targetName, $permissions, $parentId = null) {
|
||||
$this->lastShareTime += 100;
|
||||
$qb = $this->connection->getQueryBuilder();
|
||||
$values = [
|
||||
'share_type' => $qb->expr()->literal($type),
|
||||
|
|
@ -119,7 +103,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
'file_source' => $qb->expr()->literal($sourceId),
|
||||
'file_target' => $qb->expr()->literal($targetName),
|
||||
'permissions' => $qb->expr()->literal($permissions),
|
||||
'stime' => $qb->expr()->literal(time()),
|
||||
'stime' => $qb->expr()->literal($this->lastShareTime),
|
||||
];
|
||||
if ($parentId !== null) {
|
||||
$values['parent'] = $qb->expr()->literal($parentId);
|
||||
|
|
@ -204,7 +188,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
[
|
||||
// #2 bogus share
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group1, group2
|
||||
// - one subshare for each group share
|
||||
// - one subshare for each group share, both with parenthesis
|
||||
// - but the targets do not match when grouped
|
||||
[
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 123, 'recipientgroup1', '/test', 31],
|
||||
|
|
@ -218,7 +202,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
[
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
// reset to original name
|
||||
// reset to original name as the sub-names have parenthesis
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
// leave unrelated alone
|
||||
|
|
@ -228,6 +212,54 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
[
|
||||
// #3 bogus share
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group1, group2
|
||||
// - one subshare for each group share, both renamed manually
|
||||
// - but the targets do not match when grouped
|
||||
[
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 123, 'recipientgroup1', '/test', 31],
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 123, 'recipientgroup2', '/test', 31],
|
||||
// child of the previous ones
|
||||
[DefaultShareProvider::SHARE_TYPE_USERGROUP, 123, 'user2', '/test_renamed (1 legit paren)', 31, 0],
|
||||
[DefaultShareProvider::SHARE_TYPE_USERGROUP, 123, 'user2', '/test_renamed (2 legit paren)', 31, 1],
|
||||
// different unrelated share
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 456, 'recipientgroup1', '/test (4)', 31],
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
// reset to less recent subshare name
|
||||
['/test_renamed (2 legit paren)', 31],
|
||||
['/test_renamed (2 legit paren)', 31],
|
||||
// leave unrelated alone
|
||||
['/test (4)', 31],
|
||||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #4 bogus share
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group1, group2
|
||||
// - one subshare for each group share, one with parenthesis
|
||||
// - but the targets do not match when grouped
|
||||
[
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 123, 'recipientgroup1', '/test', 31],
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 123, 'recipientgroup2', '/test', 31],
|
||||
// child of the previous ones
|
||||
[DefaultShareProvider::SHARE_TYPE_USERGROUP, 123, 'user2', '/test (2)', 31, 0],
|
||||
[DefaultShareProvider::SHARE_TYPE_USERGROUP, 123, 'user2', '/test_renamed', 31, 1],
|
||||
// different unrelated share
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 456, 'recipientgroup1', '/test (4)', 31],
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
// reset to less recent subshare name but without parenthesis
|
||||
['/test_renamed', 31],
|
||||
['/test_renamed', 31],
|
||||
// leave unrelated alone
|
||||
['/test (4)', 31],
|
||||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #5 bogus share
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group1, group2
|
||||
// - one subshare for each group share
|
||||
// - first subshare not renamed (as in real world scenario)
|
||||
// - but the targets do not match when grouped
|
||||
|
|
@ -251,7 +283,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #4 bogus share:
|
||||
// #6 bogus share:
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group1, group2
|
||||
// - one subshare for each group share
|
||||
// - non-matching targets
|
||||
|
|
@ -276,7 +308,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #5 bogus share:
|
||||
// #7 bogus share:
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group1, group2
|
||||
// - one subshare for each group share
|
||||
// - non-matching targets
|
||||
|
|
@ -301,7 +333,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #6 bogus share:
|
||||
// #8 bogus share:
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group1, group2 and also user2
|
||||
// - one subshare for each group share
|
||||
// - one extra share entry for direct share to user2
|
||||
|
|
@ -329,7 +361,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #7 bogus share:
|
||||
// #9 bogus share:
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group1 and also user2
|
||||
// - no subshare at all
|
||||
// - one extra share entry for direct share to user2
|
||||
|
|
@ -350,7 +382,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #8 legitimate share with own group:
|
||||
// #10 legitimate share with own group:
|
||||
// - insider shares with both groups the user is already in
|
||||
// - no subshares in this case
|
||||
[
|
||||
|
|
@ -368,7 +400,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #9 legitimate shares:
|
||||
// #11 legitimate shares:
|
||||
// - group share with same group
|
||||
// - group share with other group
|
||||
// - user share where recipient renamed
|
||||
|
|
@ -392,7 +424,7 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #10 legitimate share:
|
||||
// #12 legitimate share:
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group and user directly with different permissions
|
||||
// - no subshares
|
||||
// - same targets
|
||||
|
|
@ -410,6 +442,42 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
['/test (4)', 31],
|
||||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// #13 bogus share:
|
||||
// - outsider shares with group1, user2 and then group2
|
||||
// - user renamed share as soon as it arrived before the next share (order)
|
||||
// - one subshare for each group share
|
||||
// - one extra share entry for direct share to user2
|
||||
// - non-matching targets
|
||||
[
|
||||
// first share with group
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 123, 'recipientgroup1', '/test', 31],
|
||||
// recipient renames
|
||||
[DefaultShareProvider::SHARE_TYPE_USERGROUP, 123, 'user2', '/first', 31, 0],
|
||||
// then direct share, user renames too
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_USER, 123, 'user2', '/second', 31],
|
||||
// another share with the second group
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 123, 'recipientgroup2', '/test', 31],
|
||||
// use renames it
|
||||
[DefaultShareProvider::SHARE_TYPE_USERGROUP, 123, 'user2', '/third', 31, 1],
|
||||
// different unrelated share
|
||||
[Constants::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP, 456, 'recipientgroup1', '/test (5)', 31],
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
// group share with group1 left alone
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
// first subshare repaired
|
||||
['/third', 31],
|
||||
// direct user share repaired
|
||||
['/third', 31],
|
||||
// group share with group2 left alone
|
||||
['/test', 31],
|
||||
// second subshare repaired
|
||||
['/third', 31],
|
||||
// leave unrelated alone
|
||||
['/test (5)', 31],
|
||||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -419,6 +487,38 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
* @dataProvider sharesDataProvider
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public function testMergeGroupShares($shares, $expectedShares) {
|
||||
$user1 = $this->getMock('\OCP\IUser');
|
||||
$user1->expects($this->any())
|
||||
->method('getUID')
|
||||
->will($this->returnValue('user1'));
|
||||
|
||||
$user2 = $this->getMock('\OCP\IUser');
|
||||
$user2->expects($this->any())
|
||||
->method('getUID')
|
||||
->will($this->returnValue('user2'));
|
||||
|
||||
$users = [$user1, $user2];
|
||||
|
||||
$this->groupManager->expects($this->any())
|
||||
->method('getUserGroupIds')
|
||||
->will($this->returnValueMap([
|
||||
// owner
|
||||
[$user1, ['samegroup1', 'samegroup2']],
|
||||
// recipient
|
||||
[$user2, ['recipientgroup1', 'recipientgroup2']],
|
||||
]));
|
||||
|
||||
$this->userManager->expects($this->once())
|
||||
->method('countUsers')
|
||||
->will($this->returnValue([2]));
|
||||
$this->userManager->expects($this->once())
|
||||
->method('callForAllUsers')
|
||||
->will($this->returnCallback(function(\Closure $closure) use ($users) {
|
||||
foreach ($users as $user) {
|
||||
$closure($user);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
$shareIds = [];
|
||||
|
||||
foreach ($shares as $share) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -445,5 +545,30 @@ class RepairUnmergedSharesTest extends TestCase {
|
|||
$this->assertEquals($expectedShare[1], $share['permissions']);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public function duplicateNamesProvider() {
|
||||
return [
|
||||
// matching
|
||||
['filename (1).txt', true],
|
||||
['folder (2)', true],
|
||||
['filename (1)(2).txt', true],
|
||||
// non-matching
|
||||
['filename ().txt', false],
|
||||
['folder ()', false],
|
||||
['folder (1x)', false],
|
||||
['folder (x1)', false],
|
||||
['filename (a)', false],
|
||||
['filename (1).', false],
|
||||
['filename (1).txt.txt', false],
|
||||
['filename (1)..txt', false],
|
||||
];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @dataProvider duplicateNamesProvider
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public function testIsPotentialDuplicateName($name, $expectedResult) {
|
||||
$this->assertEquals($expectedResult, $this->invokePrivate($this->repair, 'isPotentialDuplicateName', [$name]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue