Resolves Issue #17885
Check getRedirectUri() for queries, and add a '&' instead of a '?' to $redirectUri if it already has them; otherwise, $redirectUri might end up with two '?'.
Signed-off-by: RussellAult <russellault@users.noreply.github.com>
There is no difference (as far as I know) between running the acceptance
tests on PHP 7.1 or on PHP 7.3; this is simply a preparatory step to be
ready when PHP 7.1 support is dropped in Nextcloud server.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Avoids directly getting the token again. We just inserted it so it and
have all the info. So that query is just a waste.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
the target storage doesn't need additional handling for wrappers as the wrappers implementation of moveFromStorage already deals with that
Any storage based on local storage isn't affected by this as local storage already has it's own way of handling with this
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
Instead of one big monolitic sections this is the first step in breaking
down the settings. This should make is easiet to see what does what. As
well as nicely splitting up the sections.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Now the link share menu is not automatically opened after a link share
is created, so waiting until it was opened failed in iShareTheLinkFor.
Note that the steps that interact with the link share menu take care
themselves of showing the menu if needed, so there is no need to
explicitly show it despite the change. Also, the waiting in
iShareTheLinkFor was introduced when the link share menu was changed
to automatically open after creating a link share, as that caused some
issues with the steps that opened the menu by themselves (fec8d12fc5).
Due to all this, now that the link share menu is again not automatically
opened the wait can be simply removed.
Signed-off-by: Greta Doci <gretadoci@gmail.com>
Although uncommon, in some cases a Context may need to be extended (for
example, to override a step defined in the server with a specific
behaviour in the acceptance tests of an app); in those cases the
subclass should be able to access the actor attribute defined in the
Context it is extending.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
As documented, the default value for config value proxyuserpwd is ''.
However, that value results in the error:
"cURL error 5: Unsupported proxy syntax in '@'".
This patch handles the values of '' and null (the default in the code)
the same for config values proxyuserpwd and proxy.
Signed-off-by: Scott Shambarger <devel@shambarger.net>
So fun fact. Chrome considers a redirect after submitting a form part of
the form actions. Since we redirect to a new protocol (nc://login/).
Causing the form submission to work but the redirect failing hard.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
This adds the events and the classes to modify the feature policy.
It also adds a default restricted feature policy.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Since federated shares have their permissions set on the node, we do not need
to check for parent share permissions. Otherwise reshares of incoming federated
have no permission variable defined and creating them will fail
Signed-off-by: Julius Härtl <jus@bitgrid.net>
There is no need to log the expcetion of most of the stuff here.
We should properly log them but an exception is excessive.
This moves it to a proper exception which we can catch and then log.
The other exceptions will still be fully logged.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
With upcoming work for the feature policy header. Splitting this in
smaller classes that just do 1 thing makes sense.
I rather have a few small classes that are tiny and do 1 thing right
(and we all understand what is going on) than have big ones.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
The userid is not relevant here, and by default cannot be used to login
with. Typically, there is a common type of login names in organizations
(LDAP username or email most often) that does not need to be disclosed.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Schiwon <blizzz@arthur-schiwon.de>
Allow passing a nonce from the web server, allowing the possibility to enforce a strict CSP from the web server.
Signed-off-by: Sam Bull <git@sambull.org>
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
This is bit hacky but a start to lock the SCSS compiler properly
Retry during 10s then give up
Properly get error message
Do not clear locks and properly debug scss caching
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
This introduces and event that can be listend to when we actually use
the CSP. This means that apps no longer have to always inject their CSP
but only do so when it is required. Yay for being lazy.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
the main difference is passing the `File` object to the provider
instead of a `View` + path
Old providers will still continue to work as before
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
Otherwise the output would just read "Failed asserting that true is
false." or "Failed asserting that false is true.", which is not very
informative when there are several assertFalse/True in a row.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The old notifications were added as ".row" elements to the
"#notification-container" element; the new notifications based on
toastify are added as ".toastify .on .toast..." elements to the
"#content" element. Besides that, they also include a span element with
an X to close the notification, so now only the first child text node
should be compared to the expected message.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
This avoids calls to the autoloader (or chain of autoloaders) to see if
for example 'principalPrefix' class can be found. While we already know
it is a string.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
The header is the full http header like: HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified
So comparing this to an int always yields false
This also makes the 304 RFC compliant as the resulting content length
should otherwise be the length of the message and not 0.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
This allows a user to mark a token for remote wipe.
Clients that support this can then wipe the device properly.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Wurst <christoph@winzerhof-wurst.at>
Once 2FA is enforced for a user and they have no 2FA setup yet this will
now prompt them with a setup screen. Given that providers are enabled
that allow setup then.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Wurst <christoph@winzerhof-wurst.at>
Changed the implementation for getProxyUri with
fd1d85365c
If proxy is already null then we don't ask for proxyuserpwd. Test
failed because we expected getSystemValue to be called once with
proxyuserpwd
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kesselberg <mail@danielkesselberg.de>
For #14179
By default responses should have the strictest (and simplest) CSP
possible. Only template responses should require an actual CSP.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
File names are no longer shown directly in the ".filename" element, but
split in two "span" elements inside a ".filename-parts" element, so now
the texts in those span elements need to be concatenated to get the file
name.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Fixes#14793
This is caused by the mess we have with OC\Settings mapping to settings
and lib/private/Settings.
Anyway this is the quick fix. Moving stuff around for 17 seems better.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
The bundle acceptance tests fails after #14578 sometimes. This is
because of a race condition. not all apps have compatible 16 versions
yet. So trying to enable them results in those apps doing 💥.
Because of #14578 we do show them now. So we try to enable them. However
depending on which requests finishes first the disable button for the
audit app either shows up or now.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
* tests/acceptance/features/login.feature:15
<details><summary>Show full log</summary>
```
Scenario: log in with valid user and invalid password once fixed by admin # /drone/src/github.com/nextcloud/server/tests/acceptance/features/login.feature:15
Given I act as John # ActorContext::iActAs()
And I can not log in with user user0 and password 654231 # LoginPageContext::iCanNotLogInWithUserAndPassword()
When I act as Jane # ActorContext::iActAs()
And I am logged in as the admin # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedInAsTheAdmin()
And I open the User settings # SettingsMenuContext::iOpenTheUserSettings()
And I set the password for user0 to 654321 # UsersSettingsContext::iSetTheFieldForUserTo()
And I act as John # ActorContext::iActAs()
And I log in with user user0 and password 654321 # LoginPageContext::iLogInWithUserAndPassword()
Then I see that the current page is the Files app # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheCurrentPageIsTheFilesApp()
Failed asserting that 'http://acceptance-login/index.php/login?user=user0' starts with "http://acceptance-login/index.php/apps/files/".
```
</details>
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
Fails with:
* tests/acceptance/features/app-files.feature:90
<details><summary>Show full log</summary>
```
Scenario: show favorites # /drone/src/github.com/nextcloud/server/tests/acceptance/features/app-files.feature:90
Given I am logged in # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedIn()
And I mark "welcome.txt" as favorite # FileListContext::iMarkAsFavorite()
When I open the "Favorites" section # AppNavigationContext::iOpenTheSection()
Then I see that the current section is "Favorites" # AppNavigationContext::iSeeThatTheCurrentSectionIs()
Then I see that the file list contains a file named "welcome.txt" # FileListContext::iSeeThatTheFileListContainsAFileNamed()
Row for file welcome.txt in file list could not be found after 100 seconds (NoSuchElementException)
```
</details>
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
Fails with:
* tests/acceptance/features/apps.feature:66
<details><summary>Show full log</summary>
```
Scenario: Show section from app store # /drone/src/github.com/nextcloud/server/tests/acceptance/features/apps.feature:66
Given I act as Jane # ActorContext::iActAs()
And I am logged in as the admin # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedInAsTheAdmin()
And I open the Apps management # SettingsMenuContext::iOpenTheAppsManagement()
And I see that the current section is "Your apps" # AppNavigationContext::iSeeThatTheCurrentSectionIs()
When I open the "Files" section # AppNavigationContext::iOpenTheSection()
Files section item in App Navigation could not be found after 100 seconds (NoSuchElementException)
Then I see that there some apps listed from the app store # AppsManagementContext::iSeeThatThereSomeAppsListedFromTheAppStore()
And I see that the current section is "Files" # AppNavigationContext::iSeeThatTheCurrentSectionIs()
```
</details>
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
Fails with:
* tests/acceptance/features/app-files-tags.feature:42
<details><summary>Show full log</summary>
```
Scenario: add tags using the dropdown in the details view # /drone/src/github.com/nextcloud/server/tests/acceptance/features/app-files-tags.feature:42
Given I am logged in as the admin # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedInAsTheAdmin()
And I visit the settings page # SettingsMenuContext::iVisitTheSettingsPage()
And I open the "Tag management" section # AppNavigationContext::iOpenTheSection()
And I see that the button to select tags is shown # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheButtonToSelectTagsIsShown()
And I create the tag "tag1" in the settings # SettingsContext::iCreateTheTagInTheSettings()
And I create the tag "tag2" in the settings # SettingsContext::iCreateTheTagInTheSettings()
And I create the tag "tag3" in the settings # SettingsContext::iCreateTheTagInTheSettings()
And I create the tag "tag4" in the settings # SettingsContext::iCreateTheTagInTheSettings()
And I see that the dropdown for tags in the settings eventually contains the tag "tag1" # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheDropdownForTagsInTheSettingsEventuallyContainsTheTag()
And I see that the dropdown for tags in the settings eventually contains the tag "tag2" # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheDropdownForTagsInTheSettingsEventuallyContainsTheTag()
And I see that the dropdown for tags in the settings eventually contains the tag "tag3" # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheDropdownForTagsInTheSettingsEventuallyContainsTheTag()
And I see that the dropdown for tags in the settings eventually contains the tag "tag4" # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheDropdownForTagsInTheSettingsEventuallyContainsTheTag()
And I log out # SettingsMenuContext::iLogOut()
And I am logged in # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedIn()
And I open the details view for "welcome.txt" # FileListContext::iOpenTheDetailsViewFor()
And I open the input field for tags in the details view # FilesAppContext::iOpenTheInputFieldForTagsInTheDetailsView()
When I check the tag "tag2" in the dropdown for tags in the details view # FilesAppContext::iCheckTheTagInTheDropdownForTagsInTheDetailsView()
And I check the tag "tag4" in the dropdown for tags in the details view # FilesAppContext::iCheckTheTagInTheDropdownForTagsInTheDetailsView()
Then I see that the tag "tag2" in the dropdown for tags in the details view is checked # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheTagInTheDropdownForTagsInTheDetailsViewIsChecked()
And I see that the tag "tag4" in the dropdown for tags in the details view is checked # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheTagInTheDropdownForTagsInTheDetailsViewIsChecked()
And I see that the input field for tags in the details view contains the tag "tag2" # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheInputFieldForTagsInTheDetailsViewContainsTheTag()
Failed asserting that false is true.
And I see that the input field for tags in the details view contains the tag "tag4" # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheInputFieldForTagsInTheDetailsViewContainsTheTag()
```
</details>
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
This adds the new login flow. The desktop client will open up a browser
and poll a returned endpoint at regular intervals to check if the flow
is done.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
This can be used by pages that do not have the full Nextcloud UI.
So notifications etc do not load there.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
There already is a separate event for this. This will make it possible
to only inject code with the logged in one on default rendered pages.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Fixes#13662
This will fire of an event after a Template Response has been returned.
There is an event for the generic loading and one when logged in. So
apps can chose to load only on loged in pages.
This is a more generic approach than the files app event. As some things
we might want to load on other pages as well besides the files app.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Some code cleanup
- willReturn instead of will(returnValue)
- Annotation for mocked objects
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kesselberg <mail@danielkesselberg.de>
When a password is reste we should make sure that all users are properly
logged in. Pending states should be cleared. For example a session where
the 2FA code is not entered yet should be cleared.
The token is now removed so the session will be killed the next time
this is checked (within 5 minutes).
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
By requesting the plain logout url we allow it to be properly cached by
the caching router. We just add the requesttoken manually.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
If the remember_login_cookie_lifetime is set to 0 this means we do not
want to use remember me at all. In that case we should also not creatae
a remember me cookie and should create a proper temp token.
Further this specifies that is not 0 the remember me time should always
be larger than the session timeout. Because else the behavior is not
really defined.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Fixes#12224
Since we only use the middleware at 1 location it makes no sense to
register them in each and every container.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
When run with php's build-in server (for instance on localhost:8080), IP provided through $this->server['REMOTE_ADDR'] is [::1], which is not an acceptable format for \inet_pton. This removes the brackets if there's any.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Citharel <tcit@tcit.fr>
Fixes#7084
Now entering wrongly cased email (roeland@ instead of Roeland@) for
password reset etc. Will also work.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Admin should _not_ be able to change password when:
- if an encryption module is loaded and it uses per-user keys
- if encryption is enabled but no encryption modules are loaded
Admin should be able to change the password when:
- no encryption module is loaded and encryption is disabled
- encryption module is loaded but it doesn't require per user keys
Signed-off-by: Bjoern Schiessle <bjoern@schiessle.org>
This prevent the object store and cache from getting out of sync
when an objectstore silently fails or the php process get's killed
during the upload without giving us the chance to cleanup
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
If the server is too slow, changing to a different file immediately
after sending a new comment but without waiting for the comment to be
shown for the original file could cause the new comment to be shown for
the current file instead.
This is, indeed, a bug in the comments. However, it is not possible to
test it reliably in the acceptance tests, as it depends on how fast the
server adds the message and how fast the client changes to a different
file; sometimes the test would fail and sometimes it would not.
Therefore, now it is waited for the comment to be added before changing
to another file, as in this case it can be reliably tested that changing
to a different file does not cause the comments from the previous file
to be shown in the current file (this was a different bug already fixed
and due to which this test was added in the first place).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When the "Comments" tab is open the empty content element is always in
the DOM, although it is only shown once the message collection was
fetched and there were no messages. Due to this it is necessary to
explicitly wait for it to be shown instead of relying on the implicit
wait made to find the element; otherwise it would be found immediately
and if the collection was not fetched yet it would not be visible,
causing the test to fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Having both "FilesAppSharingContext" and "FilesSharingAppContext" was
confusing, so "FilesSharingAppContext" was renamed to a more descriptive
name.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
To reshare a file there must be at least three enabled users in the
system; although it would be possible to run the steps to create a third
user in the scenarios that need it for convenience a third enabled user
besides "admin" and "user0" was added to the default setup.
In a similar way, a new step was added too to login as a given user
name, similar to the steps to log in as "user0" and as "admin".
Finally, another actor, "Jim", was introduced for those scenarios which
should be played by three standard actors (that is, without a special
configuration like "Rubeus").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The "Download" item in the menu of public share pages is no longer shown
in wide (>768px) windows (although the element is in the DOM and shown
if resized to a narrow window).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
In the acceptance tests the link share menu is automatically opened if
needed before interacting with an item in the menu; if the menu is not
open it is opened by clicking on its toggle.
However, since a recent change the link share menu is automatically
opened by the regular UI after the link share is created. This causes
that, sometimes, after the creation of a link share the acceptance tests
check whether the menu is shown or not before the menu was automatically
opened; as the menu is not open then the acceptance tests proceed to
click on the toggle, but in the meantime the link share was created and
the menu opened, so clicking on the toggle now closes it. As the menu is
closed it is not possible to interact with its items and the test fails.
To prevent that now the acceptance tests wait for the link share menu to
open after a link share is created before continuing with the other
steps.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
If the sendmail binary can't be found at all we fallback to the default
path.
It most likely is not there but then at least a proper error message
pops up.
Updated the tests to also properly pass.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
The update share tests only checked that the share returned by
"update()" had the expected values. However, as "update()" returns the
same share that was given as a parameter the tests were not really
verifying that the values were updated in the database.
In a similar way, the test that checked that a password was removed did
not set a password first, so even if the database returned null it could
be simply returning the default value for the share; a password must be
set first to ensure that it is removed.
Besides that, a typo was fixed too that made the checks on the original
share instead of on the one returned by "update()"; right now it is the
same share, so the change makes no difference, but it is how the check
should be done anyway.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Although now it is possible to create several link shares the acceptance
tests currently handles only the first link share; this first link share
is now created by clicking an "Add new share" button instead of a
checkbox.
Besides that, the "Copy link" button has been moved from the menu to the
row, next to the menu trigger.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
If a user can't authenticate normally (because they have 2FA that is not
available on their devices for example). The redirect that is generated
should be of the proper format.
This means
1. Include the protocol
2. Include the possible subfolder
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>