the main difference is passing the `File` object to the provider
instead of a `View` + path
Old providers will still continue to work as before
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
Before we'd round up all preview request to their nearest power of two.
This resulted still in a lot of possible images. Generating a lot of
server load and taking up a lot of space.
This moves it to previews to be powers of 4: 64, 256, 1024 and 4096
Also the first two powers are always skipped (4, 16) as it doesn't make
sense to generate previews for that.
We cache preview pretty agressively and I feel this is a better
tradeoff.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Else if a preview provider is registerd but not available (for example
missing support in some external lib). It will do 💥. This way the
providers can at least do the sanity checks required.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
For legacy reasons we stored all the previews with a png extention.
However we did not put png data in them all the time.
This caused the preview endpoints to always report that a preview is a
png file. Which was a lie.
Since we abstract away from the storage etc in the previewmanager. There
is no need anymore to store them as .png files and instead we can use
the actual file extention.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Robin Appelman
Roeland Jago Douma