The bundle acceptance tests fails after #14578 sometimes. This is
because of a race condition. not all apps have compatible 16 versions
yet. So trying to enable them results in those apps doing 💥.
Because of #14578 we do show them now. So we try to enable them. However
depending on which requests finishes first the disable button for the
audit app either shows up or now.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
* tests/acceptance/features/login.feature:15
<details><summary>Show full log</summary>
```
Scenario: log in with valid user and invalid password once fixed by admin # /drone/src/github.com/nextcloud/server/tests/acceptance/features/login.feature:15
Given I act as John # ActorContext::iActAs()
And I can not log in with user user0 and password 654231 # LoginPageContext::iCanNotLogInWithUserAndPassword()
When I act as Jane # ActorContext::iActAs()
And I am logged in as the admin # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedInAsTheAdmin()
And I open the User settings # SettingsMenuContext::iOpenTheUserSettings()
And I set the password for user0 to 654321 # UsersSettingsContext::iSetTheFieldForUserTo()
And I act as John # ActorContext::iActAs()
And I log in with user user0 and password 654321 # LoginPageContext::iLogInWithUserAndPassword()
Then I see that the current page is the Files app # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheCurrentPageIsTheFilesApp()
Failed asserting that 'http://acceptance-login/index.php/login?user=user0' starts with "http://acceptance-login/index.php/apps/files/".
```
</details>
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
Fails with:
* tests/acceptance/features/app-files.feature:90
<details><summary>Show full log</summary>
```
Scenario: show favorites # /drone/src/github.com/nextcloud/server/tests/acceptance/features/app-files.feature:90
Given I am logged in # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedIn()
And I mark "welcome.txt" as favorite # FileListContext::iMarkAsFavorite()
When I open the "Favorites" section # AppNavigationContext::iOpenTheSection()
Then I see that the current section is "Favorites" # AppNavigationContext::iSeeThatTheCurrentSectionIs()
Then I see that the file list contains a file named "welcome.txt" # FileListContext::iSeeThatTheFileListContainsAFileNamed()
Row for file welcome.txt in file list could not be found after 100 seconds (NoSuchElementException)
```
</details>
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
Fails with:
* tests/acceptance/features/apps.feature:66
<details><summary>Show full log</summary>
```
Scenario: Show section from app store # /drone/src/github.com/nextcloud/server/tests/acceptance/features/apps.feature:66
Given I act as Jane # ActorContext::iActAs()
And I am logged in as the admin # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedInAsTheAdmin()
And I open the Apps management # SettingsMenuContext::iOpenTheAppsManagement()
And I see that the current section is "Your apps" # AppNavigationContext::iSeeThatTheCurrentSectionIs()
When I open the "Files" section # AppNavigationContext::iOpenTheSection()
Files section item in App Navigation could not be found after 100 seconds (NoSuchElementException)
Then I see that there some apps listed from the app store # AppsManagementContext::iSeeThatThereSomeAppsListedFromTheAppStore()
And I see that the current section is "Files" # AppNavigationContext::iSeeThatTheCurrentSectionIs()
```
</details>
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
Fails with:
* tests/acceptance/features/app-files-tags.feature:42
<details><summary>Show full log</summary>
```
Scenario: add tags using the dropdown in the details view # /drone/src/github.com/nextcloud/server/tests/acceptance/features/app-files-tags.feature:42
Given I am logged in as the admin # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedInAsTheAdmin()
And I visit the settings page # SettingsMenuContext::iVisitTheSettingsPage()
And I open the "Tag management" section # AppNavigationContext::iOpenTheSection()
And I see that the button to select tags is shown # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheButtonToSelectTagsIsShown()
And I create the tag "tag1" in the settings # SettingsContext::iCreateTheTagInTheSettings()
And I create the tag "tag2" in the settings # SettingsContext::iCreateTheTagInTheSettings()
And I create the tag "tag3" in the settings # SettingsContext::iCreateTheTagInTheSettings()
And I create the tag "tag4" in the settings # SettingsContext::iCreateTheTagInTheSettings()
And I see that the dropdown for tags in the settings eventually contains the tag "tag1" # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheDropdownForTagsInTheSettingsEventuallyContainsTheTag()
And I see that the dropdown for tags in the settings eventually contains the tag "tag2" # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheDropdownForTagsInTheSettingsEventuallyContainsTheTag()
And I see that the dropdown for tags in the settings eventually contains the tag "tag3" # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheDropdownForTagsInTheSettingsEventuallyContainsTheTag()
And I see that the dropdown for tags in the settings eventually contains the tag "tag4" # SettingsContext::iSeeThatTheDropdownForTagsInTheSettingsEventuallyContainsTheTag()
And I log out # SettingsMenuContext::iLogOut()
And I am logged in # LoginPageContext::iAmLoggedIn()
And I open the details view for "welcome.txt" # FileListContext::iOpenTheDetailsViewFor()
And I open the input field for tags in the details view # FilesAppContext::iOpenTheInputFieldForTagsInTheDetailsView()
When I check the tag "tag2" in the dropdown for tags in the details view # FilesAppContext::iCheckTheTagInTheDropdownForTagsInTheDetailsView()
And I check the tag "tag4" in the dropdown for tags in the details view # FilesAppContext::iCheckTheTagInTheDropdownForTagsInTheDetailsView()
Then I see that the tag "tag2" in the dropdown for tags in the details view is checked # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheTagInTheDropdownForTagsInTheDetailsViewIsChecked()
And I see that the tag "tag4" in the dropdown for tags in the details view is checked # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheTagInTheDropdownForTagsInTheDetailsViewIsChecked()
And I see that the input field for tags in the details view contains the tag "tag2" # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheInputFieldForTagsInTheDetailsViewContainsTheTag()
Failed asserting that false is true.
And I see that the input field for tags in the details view contains the tag "tag4" # FilesAppContext::iSeeThatTheInputFieldForTagsInTheDetailsViewContainsTheTag()
```
</details>
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
If the server is too slow, changing to a different file immediately
after sending a new comment but without waiting for the comment to be
shown for the original file could cause the new comment to be shown for
the current file instead.
This is, indeed, a bug in the comments. However, it is not possible to
test it reliably in the acceptance tests, as it depends on how fast the
server adds the message and how fast the client changes to a different
file; sometimes the test would fail and sometimes it would not.
Therefore, now it is waited for the comment to be added before changing
to another file, as in this case it can be reliably tested that changing
to a different file does not cause the comments from the previous file
to be shown in the current file (this was a different bug already fixed
and due to which this test was added in the first place).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When the "Comments" tab is open the empty content element is always in
the DOM, although it is only shown once the message collection was
fetched and there were no messages. Due to this it is necessary to
explicitly wait for it to be shown instead of relying on the implicit
wait made to find the element; otherwise it would be found immediately
and if the collection was not fetched yet it would not be visible,
causing the test to fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Having both "FilesAppSharingContext" and "FilesSharingAppContext" was
confusing, so "FilesSharingAppContext" was renamed to a more descriptive
name.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
To reshare a file there must be at least three enabled users in the
system; although it would be possible to run the steps to create a third
user in the scenarios that need it for convenience a third enabled user
besides "admin" and "user0" was added to the default setup.
In a similar way, a new step was added too to login as a given user
name, similar to the steps to log in as "user0" and as "admin".
Finally, another actor, "Jim", was introduced for those scenarios which
should be played by three standard actors (that is, without a special
configuration like "Rubeus").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The "Download" item in the menu of public share pages is no longer shown
in wide (>768px) windows (although the element is in the DOM and shown
if resized to a narrow window).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
In the acceptance tests the link share menu is automatically opened if
needed before interacting with an item in the menu; if the menu is not
open it is opened by clicking on its toggle.
However, since a recent change the link share menu is automatically
opened by the regular UI after the link share is created. This causes
that, sometimes, after the creation of a link share the acceptance tests
check whether the menu is shown or not before the menu was automatically
opened; as the menu is not open then the acceptance tests proceed to
click on the toggle, but in the meantime the link share was created and
the menu opened, so clicking on the toggle now closes it. As the menu is
closed it is not possible to interact with its items and the test fails.
To prevent that now the acceptance tests wait for the link share menu to
open after a link share is created before continuing with the other
steps.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Although now it is possible to create several link shares the acceptance
tests currently handles only the first link share; this first link share
is now created by clicking an "Add new share" button instead of a
checkbox.
Besides that, the "Copy link" button has been moved from the menu to the
row, next to the menu trigger.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The PHP built-in server can crash when certain actions are performed in
Nextcloud (but although the crash is triggered by Nextcloud it does not
seem to be a Nextcloud bug), which can lead to failures in the
acceptance tests that would have otherwise passed.
A crash of the PHP built-in server during an acceptance test can be
identified by the message "sh: 1: kill: No such process" in the
acceptance tests output; as the PHP built-in server crashed its process
does no longer exist when it is tried to be killed when the scenario
ends.
Although the crash has been observed in other tests too it is more
prevalent in the tests for tags and the theming app. In order to
reduce the false positives those tests are now run on Apache instead of
on the PHP built-in sever. However, the rest of tests are still run on
the PHP built-in server due to its lower resource consumption.
In order to run a feature or just a scenario using Apache it has to be
tagged with "@apache"; features or scenarios without that tag (the
default) will run on the PHP built-in server instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Each time a new actor appears in a scenario the browser window of the
new actor is put in front of the browser windows of the previous actors.
Before, when acting again as a previous actor his browser window stayed
in the background; in most cases everything worked fine even if the
window was in the background, but due to a bug in the Firefox driver of
Selenium and/or maybe in Firefox itself when the window was in the
background it was not possible to set the value of an input field that
had a range selected.
Now, when acting again as a previous actor his browser window is brought
to the foreground. This prevents the bug from manifesting, but also
reflects better how a user would interact with the browser in real life.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Since there is no calendar release for 15 yet we should use an app that
we can quickly release for 15 as well.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
The share link UI no longer uses its own layout below the other shares;
now it is shown as a share row with a menu for the actions (except
enabling it, which is shown in the row itself), just like the other
shares.
The share link is no longer shown, either; now the link is got by
clicking on a "Copy URL" menu item, which copies the link to the
clipboard. As the clipboard is not accessible from the acceptance tests
the URL is now extracted from the attributes of that menu item (although
the menu item is clicked anyway to mimic the user behaviour).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Before, each section of the Files app ("All files", "Favorites"...) had
its own sidebar element. Now there is a single sidebar element for all
the sections in the Files app.
Signed-off-by: John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv) <skjnldsv@protonmail.com>
Before, the acceptance tests checked the header colour just once, as the
header colour was immediately changed once the new theming colour was
saved. This is no longer the case, as currently a transition is used to
change between the original colour and the new one, so now the
acceptance tests check repeteadly for the expected header colour until
it matches or the timeout expires.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
For consistency with the helper for the Apache web server the helper for
the PHP built-in web server was renamed too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The default and only helper to run acceptance tests run them on the PHP
built-in web server. This commit introduces a new helper that can be
used to run them on an Apache web server instead.
This helper is meant to be used by the acceptance tests of apps that
require a multi-threaded web server to run (like Talk, due to its use of
long polling). To use the helper it is only needed to set it in the
Behat configuration for the acceptance tests of the app, as explained in
the "NextcloudTestServerContext" documentation.
It is assumed that the acceptance tests are run using the default setup,
and therefore inside a Docker container based on the image for
acceptance tests from Nextcloud. Due to that the helper is expected to
have root permissions, and thus it starts and stops the Apache web
server directly using "service start/stop apache2". In the same way it
also restores the owner and group for "apps", "config" and "data" to
"www-data", as it is the user that Apache sub-processes are run as.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The "FileListContext" provides steps to interact with and check the
behaviour of a file list. However, the "FileListContext" does not know
the right file list ancestor that has to be used by the file list steps,
so until now the file list steps were explicitly wired to the Files app
and they could be used only in that case.
Instead of duplicating the steps with a slightly different name (for
example, "I create a new folder named :folderName in the public shared
folder" instead of "I create a new folder named :folderName") the steps
were generalized; now contexts that "know" that certain file list
ancestor has to be used by the FileListContext steps performed by
certain actor from that point on (until changed again) set it
explicitly. For example, when the current page is the Files app then the
ancestor of the file list is the main view of the current section of the
Files app, but when the current page is a shared link then the ancestor
is set to null (because there will be just one file list, and thus its
ancestor is not relevant to differentiate between instances)
A helper trait, "FileListAncestorSetter", was introduced to reduce the
boilerplate needed to set the file list ancestor from other contexts.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The file list is used in other places besides the Files app (for
example, the File sharing app); in those cases the locators for the file
list elements are the same, but not for the ancestor of the file list.
To make possible to reuse the file list locators in those cases too now
they receive the ancestor to use.
Note that the locators for the file actions menu were not using an
ancestor locator because it is expected that there is only one file
actions menu at a time in the whole page; that may change in the future,
but for the time being it is a valid assumption and thus the ancestor
was not added to those locators in this commit.
Although the locators were generalized the steps themselves still use
the "FilesAppContext::currentSectionMainView" locator as ancestor; the
steps will be generalized in a following commit.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Besides the extraction some minor adjustments (sorting locators for file
action menu entries to reflect the order of the menu entries in the UI,
moving parametrized locators like "createMenuItemFor" above the locators
that use them and placing "descendantOf" calls always in a new line)
were made too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
NoSuchElement exceptions are sometimes thrown instead of
StaleElementReference exceptions. This can happen when the Selenium2
driver for Mink performs an action on an element through the WebDriver
session instead of directly through the WebDriver element. In that case,
if the element with the given ID does not exist, a NoSuchElement
exception would be thrown instead of a StaleElementReference exception,
so those cases are handled like StaleElementReference exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
MoveTargetOutOfBounds exceptions are sometimes thrown instead of
ElementNotVisible exceptions. This can happen when the Selenium2 driver
for Mink moves the cursor on an element using the "moveto" method of the
Webdriver session, for example, before clicking on an element. In that
case, if the element is not visible, "moveto" would throw a
MoveTargetOutOfBounds exception instead of an ElementNotVisible
exception, so those cases are handled like ElementNotVisible exceptions.
Note that MoveTargetOutOfBounds exceptions could be thrown too if the
element was visible but "out of reach"; there is no problem in handling
those cases as if the element was not visible, as the exception will be
thrown again anyway once it is verified that the element is indeed
visible.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Instead of checking that the list contains one comment it is now checked
that a comment with certain message is visible. This makes the step (and
the locator) more reusable in future tests and also simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Roeland Jago Douma
Roeland Jago Douma
Morris Jobke
Daniel Calviño Sánchez
John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv)
Jan-Christoph Borchardt
Michael Weimann
Julius Härtl