For consistency with the helper for the Apache web server the helper for
the PHP built-in web server was renamed too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The default and only helper to run acceptance tests run them on the PHP
built-in web server. This commit introduces a new helper that can be
used to run them on an Apache web server instead.
This helper is meant to be used by the acceptance tests of apps that
require a multi-threaded web server to run (like Talk, due to its use of
long polling). To use the helper it is only needed to set it in the
Behat configuration for the acceptance tests of the app, as explained in
the "NextcloudTestServerContext" documentation.
It is assumed that the acceptance tests are run using the default setup,
and therefore inside a Docker container based on the image for
acceptance tests from Nextcloud. Due to that the helper is expected to
have root permissions, and thus it starts and stops the Apache web
server directly using "service start/stop apache2". In the same way it
also restores the owner and group for "apps", "config" and "data" to
"www-data", as it is the user that Apache sub-processes are run as.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Before, the domain was automatically added assuming that the
NextcloudTestServerContext had no parameters defined in the Behat
configuration. However, in order to use a helper for Apache it would
need to be specified in the configuration with something like:
- NextcloudTestServerContext:
nextcloudTestServerHelper: NextcloudTestServerLocalApacheHelper
The substitution now works both when a helper is specified and when it
is not; note, however, that providing custom parameters to the helper is
not supported, although they are not needed anyway so it is not really a
problem.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Apache sub-processes are run as the www-data user, and they need to be
able to write to the "apps", "config" and "data" directories, so they
have to belong to that user, and therefore the Nextcloud server has to
be installed and configured too as the www-data user. The PHP built-in
web server will still be run as the root user, but in that case the
owner of those directories makes no difference, so this is compatible
with both cases.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The Docker image for acceptance tests provides support for both the PHP
built-in web server and the Apache web server; the acceptance tests for
the server are run on the PHP built-in web server, but the acceptance
tests for some apps will have to be run on the Apache web server (for
example, Talk, as it uses long polling), so a Docker image to support
both cases has to be used in "run.sh". ".drone.yml" was just updated for
consistency, although it was not really needed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When the acceptance tests were run they were always loaded from the
"tests/acceptance" directory of the Nextcloud server. Now it is possible
to set the directory used to look for the Behat configuration and the
Nextcloud installation script, which makes possible to run acceptance
tests for the apps too instead of only for the server (although if no
directory is explicitly given the tests for the server are the ones
run).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
In order to autoload the server context classes the "bootstrap"
directory was explicitly listed in Behat autoload configuration. This is
fine in the configuration of acceptance tests for the server, but it
would force the configuration of acceptance tests for the apps to
explicitly include the path for the server context classes to be able to
use them (for example, for the login step).
Besides with its own configuration Behat also supports autoloading
classes using Composer, so now context classes are autoloaded using
Composer instead; thanks to this the server context classes are
autoloaded also in the acceptance tests for apps without any explicit
configuration in them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The "FileListContext" provides steps to interact with and check the
behaviour of a file list. However, the "FileListContext" does not know
the right file list ancestor that has to be used by the file list steps,
so until now the file list steps were explicitly wired to the Files app
and they could be used only in that case.
Instead of duplicating the steps with a slightly different name (for
example, "I create a new folder named :folderName in the public shared
folder" instead of "I create a new folder named :folderName") the steps
were generalized; now contexts that "know" that certain file list
ancestor has to be used by the FileListContext steps performed by
certain actor from that point on (until changed again) set it
explicitly. For example, when the current page is the Files app then the
ancestor of the file list is the main view of the current section of the
Files app, but when the current page is a shared link then the ancestor
is set to null (because there will be just one file list, and thus its
ancestor is not relevant to differentiate between instances)
A helper trait, "FileListAncestorSetter", was introduced to reduce the
boilerplate needed to set the file list ancestor from other contexts.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The file list is used in other places besides the Files app (for
example, the File sharing app); in those cases the locators for the file
list elements are the same, but not for the ancestor of the file list.
To make possible to reuse the file list locators in those cases too now
they receive the ancestor to use.
Note that the locators for the file actions menu were not using an
ancestor locator because it is expected that there is only one file
actions menu at a time in the whole page; that may change in the future,
but for the time being it is a valid assumption and thus the ancestor
was not added to those locators in this commit.
Although the locators were generalized the steps themselves still use
the "FilesAppContext::currentSectionMainView" locator as ancestor; the
steps will be generalized in a following commit.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Besides the extraction some minor adjustments (sorting locators for file
action menu entries to reflect the order of the menu entries in the UI,
moving parametrized locators like "createMenuItemFor" above the locators
that use them and placing "descendantOf" calls always in a new line)
were made too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
NoSuchElement exceptions are sometimes thrown instead of
StaleElementReference exceptions. This can happen when the Selenium2
driver for Mink performs an action on an element through the WebDriver
session instead of directly through the WebDriver element. In that case,
if the element with the given ID does not exist, a NoSuchElement
exception would be thrown instead of a StaleElementReference exception,
so those cases are handled like StaleElementReference exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
MoveTargetOutOfBounds exceptions are sometimes thrown instead of
ElementNotVisible exceptions. This can happen when the Selenium2 driver
for Mink moves the cursor on an element using the "moveto" method of the
Webdriver session, for example, before clicking on an element. In that
case, if the element is not visible, "moveto" would throw a
MoveTargetOutOfBounds exception instead of an ElementNotVisible
exception, so those cases are handled like ElementNotVisible exceptions.
Note that MoveTargetOutOfBounds exceptions could be thrown too if the
element was visible but "out of reach"; there is no problem in handling
those cases as if the element was not visible, as the exception will be
thrown again anyway once it is verified that the element is indeed
visible.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Instead of checking that the list contains one comment it is now checked
that a comment with certain message is visible. This makes the step (and
the locator) more reusable in future tests and also simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Depending on the previous steps the new comment field may be already
shown or not when the step to create a new comment is executed.
Therefore, the timeout was increased from 2 to the "standard" 10 seconds
used in other tests.
If the new comment field was found there is no need to use a timeout
when looking for the new comment button; it is either there or not, it
will not appear after some time.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The locators are moved above the step definitions for consistency with
other context files; besides that I made some minor adjustments for
consistency too in the locator descriptions and identation, and moved
the locators for ".newCommentRow" descendants together.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When clicking on "Share link" in the "Sharing" tab of the Files app an
input field with the link appears. That input field already exists in
the DOM, although empty, before clicking on "Share link", and when that
is done the proper value is set and then the input field is shown.
In the acceptance tests "getValue()" can return the value of hidden
elements too, so as long as an element exists its value is returned
without waiting for the field to be visible. Due to this if the test
code runs too fast the "I write down the shared link" step could be
executed before the proper value was set, so the shared link got in that
case would be an empty value, and this would lead to failures when the
following steps were executed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Fixes#7158. Adds a # on the color if missing.
Increased maxlength, added hash:true for jscolor, and adding a # if not present on the change event.
Since the input element now allows a hex code, changed values to hexcode.
In addition, added a function to get RGB array from hex or rgb values. Calling it in both methods and using it to perform comparison.
Also changed the way we were determining whether the jscolor component had loaded.
Changed the control to use data-jscolor rather than defining opts in the class.
Signed-off-by: Abijeet <abijeetpatro@gmail.com>
Firefox and Chrome drivers for Selenium refuse to click on an element if
the point to be clicked is covered by a different element, throwing an
UnknownError exception with message "Element is not clickable at point
({x}, {y}). Other element would receive the click: {element}". Although
in general that would be a legit error (as the user would not be able to
click on the element) due to a bad layout, sometimes this can be just a
temporal issue caused by an animation, in which case there would be no
problem once the animation finished and the elements are all in their
final location.
Unfortunately, automatically handling those situations in which the
problem is caused by an animation by just retrying a few times if the
element to be clicked is covered before giving up would probably cause
confusion instead of easing test writing.
The reason is that if the center of the element is covered by another
one the Firefox driver for Selenium tries to click on the corners of the
element instead. The problem is that the coordinates used for the click
are integer values, but Firefox has sub-pixel accuracy, so sometimes
(depending on which corner is not covered and whether the left, top,
width or height properties of the element to be clicked have a decimal
component or not) the clicks silently land on a different HTML element
(and that is with squared borders; with round borders they always land
on a different HTML element. That was partially addressed for Selenium
3.0 by clicking first on the edges, but it would still fail if the
middle point of the edges is covered but not the corners).
It is not possible to fix or even detect all that from the tests (except
maybe with some extreme hacks involving accessing private PHP members
from Mink and bypassing or replacing the standard JavaScript executed by
the Firefox driver with a custom implementation...), so it is not
possible to ensure that clicks during an animation will land on the
right element (in fact it is not possible even on static elements,
although except when the layout is wrong there should be no problem);
sometimes retrying a click when the element is covered would solve the
problem, sometimes it would cause a different element to be clicked (and
sometimes there would be even no retry, as the first click would have
silently landed on a different element than the expected one).
Therefore, a different approach must be used. Instead of trying to
automatically handle clicks during animations the tests must be written
being aware of the problem and thus waiting somehow for the animations
that can cause a problem to end before performing the clicks.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
This is a preparatory step for a following commit in which the position
of the favorite icon and the checkbox will be swapped; in that new
design the favorite icon is no longer expected to be an action but just
a simple mark on whether the file is favorited or not (the action is
expected to be triggered then only from the file actions menu).
The favorite icon is now fully shown or completely hidden depending on
whether the file is favorited or not. As the icon is just informative
but no longer an action now it does not change when hovered or focus. In
the same way, the alternative text when the file is not favorited now it
is not "Favorite" (an action) but "Not favorited" instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Currently a file can be favorited either through the inline action or
through the file actions menu. However, the inline action will be
removed in a following commit and then it will be possible to do it only
through the file actions menu.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv)
Daniel Calviño Sánchez
Morris Jobke
Julius Härtl
Roeland Jago Douma
Robert Pirritano
Abijeet
Arthur Schiwon