When avatar scope is private, the PlaceholderAvatar is used to deliver a
placeholder avatar based on the user's initials.
This was implemented as a separate class for now to avoid messing with
the existing UserAvatar implementation and its generated vs
non-generated logic.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Petry <vincent@nextcloud.com>
Use new scope values in settings page.
Adjust all consumers to use the new constants.
Map old scope values to new ones in account property getter.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Petry <vincent@nextcloud.com>
Added new v2-private account manager scope that restricts the scope
further by excluding public link access.
Avatars with v2-private account scope are now showing the guest avatar
instead of the real avatar.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Petry <vincent@nextcloud.com>
Remove "ocs-provider" test folder reference as it doesn't exist any
more.
Added back "Test" test subdir and fixed the tests inside.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Petry <vincent@nextcloud.com>
It seems Phpunit < 9 was case insensitive.
Fixed the phpunit config to target the correct name for the "Core" test
directory.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Petry <vincent@nextcloud.com>
Updating a user or group share now uses the correct method for the
validation of the expiration date. Instead of using the one from links
it uses the one for internal shares.
To avoid future confusion, the method "validateExpirationDate" has been
renamed to "validateExpirationDateLink".
Signed-off-by: Vincent Petry <vincent@nextcloud.com>
* Some implementations might check for different things
* IT will not change how the current ones work
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
User "user1" is added when installing and configuring the server, so it
is already added in all tests.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
User "user1" is added when installing and configuring the server, so it
is already added in all tests. As the test verifies that just added
users can be searched in the contacts menu a new user should be actually
added.
The test did not fail because it assumed that "user1" did not exist and
just checked that it existed after "adding" it, but not whether adding
it failed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The input element is always hidden, so the check always ended falling
back to the label. Moreover, the label is the element that the user
interacts with, so it must be the one used.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Although if the element could not be found an exception would be thrown
and the test aborted if an element is in the DOM but hidden it would be
found and the test would pass.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Instead of looking for the bundle button and then checking its value now
the expected value is included in the locator and the button is checked
similarly to other elements.
No "Disable all" locator was added as it was not currently needed
anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
"Actor::find" is a more robust way to look for elements, as it handles
some exceptions that may be thrown. Therefore, even if the elements are
not actually used and it is only checked whether they exist or not using
the actor is the preferred way when possible (and it also makes it
consistent with the rest of the acceptance tests).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Vincent Petry
Roeland Jago Douma
Morris Jobke
Johannes Leuker
John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv)
Daniel Calviño Sánchez
Robin Appelman
Julius Härtl
Joas Schilling
Joas Schilling
Roeland Jago Douma
kesselb