This can be used by pages that do not have the full Nextcloud UI.
So notifications etc do not load there.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
There already is a separate event for this. This will make it possible
to only inject code with the logged in one on default rendered pages.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Fixes#13662
This will fire of an event after a Template Response has been returned.
There is an event for the generic loading and one when logged in. So
apps can chose to load only on loged in pages.
This is a more generic approach than the files app event. As some things
we might want to load on other pages as well besides the files app.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Some code cleanup
- willReturn instead of will(returnValue)
- Annotation for mocked objects
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kesselberg <mail@danielkesselberg.de>
When a password is reste we should make sure that all users are properly
logged in. Pending states should be cleared. For example a session where
the 2FA code is not entered yet should be cleared.
The token is now removed so the session will be killed the next time
this is checked (within 5 minutes).
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
By requesting the plain logout url we allow it to be properly cached by
the caching router. We just add the requesttoken manually.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
If the remember_login_cookie_lifetime is set to 0 this means we do not
want to use remember me at all. In that case we should also not creatae
a remember me cookie and should create a proper temp token.
Further this specifies that is not 0 the remember me time should always
be larger than the session timeout. Because else the behavior is not
really defined.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Fixes#12224
Since we only use the middleware at 1 location it makes no sense to
register them in each and every container.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
When run with php's build-in server (for instance on localhost:8080), IP provided through $this->server['REMOTE_ADDR'] is [::1], which is not an acceptable format for \inet_pton. This removes the brackets if there's any.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Citharel <tcit@tcit.fr>
Fixes#7084
Now entering wrongly cased email (roeland@ instead of Roeland@) for
password reset etc. Will also work.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Admin should _not_ be able to change password when:
- if an encryption module is loaded and it uses per-user keys
- if encryption is enabled but no encryption modules are loaded
Admin should be able to change the password when:
- no encryption module is loaded and encryption is disabled
- encryption module is loaded but it doesn't require per user keys
Signed-off-by: Bjoern Schiessle <bjoern@schiessle.org>
This prevent the object store and cache from getting out of sync
when an objectstore silently fails or the php process get's killed
during the upload without giving us the chance to cleanup
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
If the server is too slow, changing to a different file immediately
after sending a new comment but without waiting for the comment to be
shown for the original file could cause the new comment to be shown for
the current file instead.
This is, indeed, a bug in the comments. However, it is not possible to
test it reliably in the acceptance tests, as it depends on how fast the
server adds the message and how fast the client changes to a different
file; sometimes the test would fail and sometimes it would not.
Therefore, now it is waited for the comment to be added before changing
to another file, as in this case it can be reliably tested that changing
to a different file does not cause the comments from the previous file
to be shown in the current file (this was a different bug already fixed
and due to which this test was added in the first place).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When the "Comments" tab is open the empty content element is always in
the DOM, although it is only shown once the message collection was
fetched and there were no messages. Due to this it is necessary to
explicitly wait for it to be shown instead of relying on the implicit
wait made to find the element; otherwise it would be found immediately
and if the collection was not fetched yet it would not be visible,
causing the test to fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Having both "FilesAppSharingContext" and "FilesSharingAppContext" was
confusing, so "FilesSharingAppContext" was renamed to a more descriptive
name.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
To reshare a file there must be at least three enabled users in the
system; although it would be possible to run the steps to create a third
user in the scenarios that need it for convenience a third enabled user
besides "admin" and "user0" was added to the default setup.
In a similar way, a new step was added too to login as a given user
name, similar to the steps to log in as "user0" and as "admin".
Finally, another actor, "Jim", was introduced for those scenarios which
should be played by three standard actors (that is, without a special
configuration like "Rubeus").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The "Download" item in the menu of public share pages is no longer shown
in wide (>768px) windows (although the element is in the DOM and shown
if resized to a narrow window).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
In the acceptance tests the link share menu is automatically opened if
needed before interacting with an item in the menu; if the menu is not
open it is opened by clicking on its toggle.
However, since a recent change the link share menu is automatically
opened by the regular UI after the link share is created. This causes
that, sometimes, after the creation of a link share the acceptance tests
check whether the menu is shown or not before the menu was automatically
opened; as the menu is not open then the acceptance tests proceed to
click on the toggle, but in the meantime the link share was created and
the menu opened, so clicking on the toggle now closes it. As the menu is
closed it is not possible to interact with its items and the test fails.
To prevent that now the acceptance tests wait for the link share menu to
open after a link share is created before continuing with the other
steps.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
If the sendmail binary can't be found at all we fallback to the default
path.
It most likely is not there but then at least a proper error message
pops up.
Updated the tests to also properly pass.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
The update share tests only checked that the share returned by
"update()" had the expected values. However, as "update()" returns the
same share that was given as a parameter the tests were not really
verifying that the values were updated in the database.
In a similar way, the test that checked that a password was removed did
not set a password first, so even if the database returned null it could
be simply returning the default value for the share; a password must be
set first to ensure that it is removed.
Besides that, a typo was fixed too that made the checks on the original
share instead of on the one returned by "update()"; right now it is the
same share, so the change makes no difference, but it is how the check
should be done anyway.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Although now it is possible to create several link shares the acceptance
tests currently handles only the first link share; this first link share
is now created by clicking an "Add new share" button instead of a
checkbox.
Besides that, the "Copy link" button has been moved from the menu to the
row, next to the menu trigger.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
If a user can't authenticate normally (because they have 2FA that is not
available on their devices for example). The redirect that is generated
should be of the proper format.
This means
1. Include the protocol
2. Include the possible subfolder
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>