The controller can receive an optional subset of the properties of the
user settings; values not given are set to "null" by default. However,
those null values overwrote the previously existing values, so in
practice any value not given was deleted from the user settings. Now
only non null values overwrite the previous values.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
"AccountManager::updateUser()" wipes previous user data with whichever
user data is given (except for some adjustments, like resetting the
verified status when needed). As the controller overrode the properties
those properties would lose some of their attributes even if they are
not affected by the changes made by the controller. Now the controller
only modifies the attributes set ("value" and "scope") to prevent that.
Note that with this change the controller no longer removes the
"verified" status, but this is not a problem because, as mentioned,
"AccountManager::updateUser()" resets them when needed (for example,
when the value of the website property changes).
This change is a previous step to fix overwritting properties with null
values, and it will prevent the controller from making unexpected
changes if more attributes are added in the future.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Right now it makes no difference, but this should make future tests
clearer, specially in case of failure.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The fields for phone number, address, website and twitter are now
editable regardless whether federated sharing and the lookup server
are enabled or not.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Petry <vincent@nextcloud.com>
Use new scope values in settings page.
Adjust all consumers to use the new constants.
Map old scope values to new ones in account property getter.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Petry <vincent@nextcloud.com>
To continue this formatting madness, here's a tiny patch that adds
unified formatting for control structures like if and loops as well as
classes, their methods and anonymous functions. This basically forces
the constructs to start on the same line. This is not exactly what PSR2
wants, but I think we can have a few exceptions with "our" style. The
starting of braces on the same line is pracrically standard for our
code.
This also removes and empty lines from method/function bodies at the
beginning and end.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Wurst <christoph@winzerhof-wurst.at>
Daniel Calviño Sánchez
Vincent Petry
Joas Schilling
Christoph Wurst
Arthur Schiwon
Morris Jobke
Roeland Jago Douma