Now that the checkbox was moved to its own column clicking on the
thumbnail should behave like clicking on the file name. To achieve this
the left position was replaced with a padding, so the element is kept at
the same place while extending its clickable area to cover the
thumbnail.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The selection column is not only a visual column, but also a real column
of the file list table. Unlike other columns whose width is reduced in
space constrained screens the selection column must stay the same so the
tapping area is large enough to be easily usable
The selection column does not appear in the search results table, so its
contents have to be explicitly aligned with those of the main table
based on whether the main table has a selection column or not (using the
"has-selection" CSS class in the same way as the "has-favorite" CSS
class was being used when there was a column for favorite actions).
In the tests the ":visible" selector can no longer be used. That
selector matches elements with a width or height that is greater than
zero, but the dimensions calculated in the unit tests are not reliable;
the width of the link was zero before these changes, and now moving the
checkbox to its own column causes the height of the link to become zero
too, so it no longer matches the ":visible" selector even if it is not
hidden. As hidding and showing the link is based on its "display" CSS
property its value is the one checked now.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The "has-favorites" CSS class is no longer used after moving the
favorite mark to the top right corner of the thumbnail, so there is no
need to add it to the table.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The favorite icon was shown on its own "column" (not a real column in
the table, but a visual column achieved through margins and left
positions). Now the icon was moved to the top right corner of the file
thumbnail, and the thumbnail and file name were moved to the left to
fill the space left by the "column".
To keep the markup in line with its visual representation (and to ease
the placing through CSS), the favorite mark is no longer prepended to
the row, but appended to the thumbnail instead. In the same way, the
thumbnail is no longer appended to the checkbox label, but to the link
with the name of the file instead (although the checkbox is still shown
at the bottom right corner of the thumbnail, and clicking on the
thumbnail still selects the file). In order to show the "busy" state on
a file the "icon-loading-small" CSS class is set to the parent element
of the thumbnail, so the thumbnail is also wrapped now by another div
with the same size and position as the label.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The checkbox is not shown always with full opacity, though, in order to
reduce the visual noise (specially later, once the checkbox is moved to
its own column).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
This is a preparatory step for a following commit in which the position
of the favorite icon and the checkbox will be swapped; in that new
design the favorite icon is no longer expected to be an action but just
a simple mark on whether the file is favorited or not (the action is
expected to be triggered then only from the file actions menu).
The favorite icon is now fully shown or completely hidden depending on
whether the file is favorited or not. As the icon is just informative
but no longer an action now it does not change when hovered or focus. In
the same way, the alternative text when the file is not favorited now it
is not "Favorite" (an action) but "Not favorited" instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The new FileAction for the menu is essentially the same as the old
inline FileAction, except for the rendering; in this case the FileAction
is shown in the menu in a standard way, so there is no need to provide a
custom renderer (although the menu entry text and icon change depending
on whether the file is currently a favorite or not, but that can be done
just with displayName and iconClass functions).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Icon class function properties make possible to render a different icon
class depending on the context of the file action.
Inline file actions had support for them already and called them passing
the file name and context of the file action as parameters. Due to this
the FileActionsMenu passes those parameters too to icon class functions
instead of just the context like done for display name functions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The helper funtion did not handle the response correctly and basically
only returned the last share with tags.
This is a simple rewrite. That is still understandable. Loops maybe more
than strictly required. But preformance is not the issue here.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
If the estimated upload time is bigger than 4 hours it shows the text
"Uploading..." because the time then doesn't give any good hint to the
user anyways.
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
Just fetch the first 10kb. This should be more than enough in 99% of the
cases. And avoid downloading a 10mb text file just to display a tiny
portion.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
The sort comparator checks the "isFavorite" property of the FileInfo
objects to compare. That property is set when the file list is loaded
and the response from the server is parsed, and thus a freshly loaded
file list has the proper sorting for favorite files. However, the
property is not set in other cases, like when the FileInfo objects are
derived from FileInfoModels due to a file being marked as a favorite or
a text editor being closed, which causes the file to be sorted in the
wrong position.
There is no need to add the property in those situations, though; in all
cases the TagsPlugin adds a "tags" array property that contains an
OC.TAG_FAVORITE tag, so that tag can be checked instead of "isFavorite".
Moreover, although "isFavorite" was added by the main "_parseFileInfo"
function it did not really belong there but to the "FileInfoParser" from
the TagsPlugin; however, as that property now is not used anywhere it
was removed altogether.
A cleaner solution would have been to make the sort comparator
extensible by plugins like other behaviours of the file list and then
add the sorting logic related to favorite files to the TagsPlugin.
However, right now only the TagsPlugin would need to alter the main
sorting logic, and it seems like a corner case anyway. Even if it is
implemented as a plugin, favorite files is a core feature, so for the
time being it will be taken into account directly in the main sorting
logic; making the sort comparator extensible by plugins is defered until
there are other use cases for that.
Fixes#5410
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The unit of `data.bitrate` is bit, but the argument unit of
`humanFileSize` function is byte, so it should be divided by 8.
Signed-off-by: Yaojin Qian <i@ume.ink>
The upload remaining time is always 'a few second' whatever a big or a
small file uploading.
This commit fixes it. The `new Date().getMilliseconds()` only return a
three digits number. When time arrived the next second, the millisecond
start from ZERO again. So `new Date().getTime()` is the righe choice.
And remaining time variables shoule be initialized when the file starts
uploading, otherwise the remaining time of a new upload will always be
'Infinity years' until you refresh the page.
Signed-off-by: Yaojin Qian <i@ume.ink>
The post-render event makes possible to modify the
MainFileInfoDetailsView element once it has been rendered, which is
needed by OCA.SystemTags.FilesPlugin to add the "Tags" label to the file
details, while the pre-render event makes possible to detach added
elements if needed before the MainFileInfoDetailsView is rendered again,
as that removes the events from the child DOM elements even if they
belong to other views.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
In some cases, an app may need to act on a detail view registered by
another app or the core, for example, to add extra elements to the
element of the detail view.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>