Part of my ongoing battle against deprecation messages.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Signed-off-by: npmbuildbot[bot] <npmbuildbot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
When a remote share is deleted, we notify the remove instance. This may
trigger various error conditions, which we want to catch in order to
avoid undeletable shares. The try-catch, however, did only capture
exceptions, so things like TypeErrors were not caught and caused the
process to fail hard.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Wurst <christoph@winzerhof-wurst.at>
Already announced for 19 that it would go. So now it realy does go.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Signed-off-by: npmbuildbot[bot] <npmbuildbot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Enabling the "send password by Talk" property of shares require that
Talk is installed and enabled, so the Drone step that runs them has to
first clone the Talk repository.
When the integration tests are run on a local development instance,
however, it is not guaranteed that Talk is installed. Due to this the
"@Talk" tag was added, which ensures that any feature or scenario marked
with it will first check if Talk is installed and, if not, skip the
scenario (instead of failing).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
In most cases, when a mail share is created or updated an e-mail is sent
to the sharee, which is done by connecting to the SMTP server set in the
configuration. If the server can not be contacted then the creation or
update of the mail share fails.
To make possible to test mail shares without using a real SMTP server a
fake one has been added. The original script, which is MIT licensed, was
based on inetd, so it was slightly modified to run on its own.
In order to use it from the integration tests the "Given dummy mail
server is listening" step has to be called in the scenarios in which the
mail server is needed.
For now that is the only available step; things like checking the sent
mails, while possible (as the script can log the mails to certain file),
have not been added yet.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Note that the "last link share can be downloaded" step was kept as it
tests the "url" property specific of link shares.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When "send password by Talk" was disabled in a mail share it was
possible to keep the same password as before, as it does not pose any
security issue (unlike keeping it when "send password by Talk" is
enabled, as in that case the password was already disclosed by mail).
However, if a mail share is updated but the password is not set again
only the hashed password will be available. In that case it would not
make sense to send the password by mail, so now the password must be
changed when disabling "send password by Talk".
Note that, even if explicitly setting the same password again along with
the "send password by Talk" property would work, this was also prevented
for simplicity.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
\OCP\IShare does not exist; the right name is \OCP\Share\IShare,
although it is already imported as IShare.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When "send password by Talk" is enabled in a mail share a new password
must be also set. However, when the passwords of the original and the
new share were compared it was not taken into account that the original
password is now hashed, while the new one is not (unless no new password
was sent, in which case the password of the original share was set in
the new share by the controller, but that was already prevented due to
both passwords being literally the same), so it was possible to set the
same password again.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When "send password by Talk" is enabled in a link share now a non empty
password is enforced.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When a mail share was created with a password the given password was not
hashed, so it was not possible to open the share with that password.
Moreover, if passwords were enforced the given password was ignored and
a new one was set (although in this case it was hashed so it worked as
expected). Now the given password is properly hashed and not overriden.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Right now if you want to get events via the Node API you have to have a
real instance of the Root. Which in turns sets up the whole FS.
We should make sure this is done lazy. Else enabling the preview
generator for example makes you setup the whole FS on each and every
authenticated call.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
dependabot-preview[bot]
Roeland Jago Douma
Joas Schilling
Christoph Wurst
Nextcloud bot
Roeland Jago Douma
Christoph Wurst
Morris Jobke
Daniel Calviño Sánchez
Joas Schilling